SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 99

P.N.MUKHERJEE, AMARESH ROY
DURGASREE STORES – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE, WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALAK GUPTA, Amiya Kumar Chatterjee, ATINDRA KUMAR MITTER, K.C.MUKHERJI

( 1 ) THIS Rule was issued under Article 227 of the Constitution by (against ?) Shri N. Roy Choudhury, Additional Member, Board of Revenue, West Bengal, rejecting the revisional application of the present petitioner in the matter of assessment of tax under Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a partnership firm, engaged in the business of wholesale distributor of stationery and toilet goods, provisions and other allied products. The firm was registered as a 'dealer' under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, and Registration Certificate bearing No. C. S. I/2193a, was issued to the petitioner firm.

( 3 ) IN course of its business, the petitioner firm claims to have sold goods to various parties, many of whom were also 'registered dealers' under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. During the assessment proceeding for the year 1954-55 under Section 11 of the above Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, the petitioner firm submitted a return, showing the gross turn-over for the period of four quarters, ended 31st March, 1955, at Rs. 15,62,840-5-6 p. and the corresponding Trading Profit and Loss Account was also produced, showing the sales at the sam


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top