SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 205

P.B.MUKHARJI
SACHINDRA MOHAN NANDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DUTTA, D.N.Basu, N.C.CHAKRAVARTI, NANDALAL PAL, SUSHIL BISWAS

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IF France had once been the inspiration of European culture, French Chandernagore can at least sun be described as a prolific source here of Indian Constitutional law. Numerous cases have come to the Court from what used to be the French Settlement of Chandernagore and their decisions now enrich the constitutional law of India. The petitioners in this case from Chandernagore challenge the validity of a requisition of land under Section 3 (1) of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act of 1948 (West Bengal Act II of 1948 ). If the decayed City gates of former French Chandernagore still display the three famous ideals of the French Republic from out of the French Revolution, "liberte, Egalite and. Fraternite", this petition from Chandernagore, by a strange irony of fate, claims neither equality, nor fraternity with the rest of India. This petition claims that this West Bengal statute should be excluded from what was formerly known as the french Chandernagore, but now an integral part of the territory of the independent Republic of India.

( 2 ) THE orders of requisition against which the present complaint is made in the petition are issued by t























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top