B.N.BANERJEE
RABINDRA NATH SEN – Appellant
Versus
FIRST INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE three petitioners and respondents Nos. 7 to 14 are Chartered Accountants and carry on business in partnership under the name and style of Price Waterhouse Peat and Co. , inter alia, at No. B/4, Gillander House, in the town of Calcutta, Respondents Nos. 3 and 4, N. R. Mookherjee and S. Kanungo and respondent No. 5, Prantosh Bakshi, are employees under the partnership Price Waterhouse Peat and Co.
( 2 ) THERE arose a dispute between the partnership and the respondents Nos. 3 to 5 represented by their trade union, firstly, over the offer of payment of bonus at reduced rate (which is referred to in the petition as an offer o ex gratia payment to respondent NOS. 3 and 4) and, secondly, over the discharge of respondent "no. 5 on the ground of absence from office without leave. The dispute was ultimately referred by the respondent State Government to the First Industrial Tribunal for adjudication. The issues referred to the Tribunal were: (1) Whether deduction of bonus granted to Sri N. R. Mookerjee and S. Kanungo is justified? To what relief are they entitled? (2) Is the discharge of Sri Prantosh Bakshi justified? What relief is he entitled to?
( 3 ) THE pet
Raman and Raman Ltd. v. State of Madras
Lila Vati Bai v. State of Bombay
National Union of Commercial Employees v. Meher Industrial Tribunal, Bombay
Corporation of City of Nagpur v. Its Employees
Ahmedabad Textile Industry Research Association v. State of Bombay
Referred to : N.R.Mukherji v. Arnold Hartman Just
State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.