P.C.MALLICK
DAMODAR SHAH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act to determine the existence of an arbitration agreement.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is a contractor who submitted on 18-7-1952 a tender for the supply of sal and teakwood of twenty different specifications for the supply of which tenders were invited by the Directorate of Supply. The Directorate of Supply purported to accept the tender submitted by the petitioner on 13-11-1952 and an acceptance note was issued on the same date. The petitioner contends that there was no concluded contract on the so-called acceptance of tender on 13-11-1952, firstly because the tender was open to acceptance by the Directorate of Supply till 31-10-1952 and could not be accepted on 13-11-1952 and secondly, because the terms contained in the tender are different from the terms issued in the A/t dated 13-11-1952 and hence the parties were not "consensus ed idem". The respondents contend that the A/t dated 13-11-1952 evidences a concluded contract and that the petitioner has committed a breach thereof and as such is liable in damages to the extent of Rs. 1,69,803/8/ -. The present notice has been taken out by the peti
REFERRED TO : State of Bombay v. Adamjee Hajee Dawood and Co.
Anderson Wright and Co. v. Moran and Co.
Sankara Mining Syndicate Ltd. Nellore v. Secy, of State
New Churulia Coal Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Perumal Mudaliar v. Province of Madras
P.H. Avari v. State of West Bengal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.