SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 66

P.C.MALLICK
DAMODAR SHAH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.SEN, G.P.KAR, S.ROY, SUBIMAL ROY, SUBRATA ROY

P. C. MALLICK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act to determine the existence of an arbitration agreement.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a contractor who submitted on 18-7-1952 a tender for the supply of sal and teakwood of twenty different specifications for the supply of which tenders were invited by the Directorate of Supply. The Directorate of Supply purported to accept the tender submitted by the petitioner on 13-11-1952 and an acceptance note was issued on the same date. The petitioner contends that there was no concluded contract on the so-called acceptance of tender on 13-11-1952, firstly because the tender was open to acceptance by the Directorate of Supply till 31-10-1952 and could not be accepted on 13-11-1952 and secondly, because the terms contained in the tender are different from the terms issued in the A/t dated 13-11-1952 and hence the parties were not "consensus ed idem". The respondents contend that the A/t dated 13-11-1952 evidences a concluded contract and that the petitioner has committed a breach thereof and as such is liable in damages to the extent of Rs. 1,69,803/8/ -. The present notice has been taken out by the peti















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top