SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 113

CHAKRABARTI, LAHIRI
BENOY KUMAR SAHAS ROY – Appellant
Versus
COMMR. OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALAI CHAND PAL, E.MEYER, JYOTISH CHANDRA PAL

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS reference relates to a re-assessment under Section 34, Indian Income-tax Act and comprises two points taken by the assessee, one of which seeks to make out that the entire re-assessment proceedings were without jurisdiction and the other of which seeks to make out that, in any event, the income brought to tax under the re-assessment was not taxable. The contention in the first case is that the Income-tax Officer had no "definite information" on which he could legally proceed under Section 34. In the second case, it is that the income concerned, is agricultural income.

( 2 ) BEFORE dealing with the reference on the merits, it is necessary to dispose of a preliminary point. Section 66 (1), Income-tax Act provides that the Commissioner or the assessee may, by an application made within a certain time, require the Appellate Tribunal to refer to the High Court any question of law arising out of its order and further provides that "the Appellate Tribunal shall, within ninety days of the receipt of such application, draw up a statement of the case and refer it to the High Court. " in the present case the reference was not made within ninety days from the r



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top