SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 423

A.K.SEN, B.C.CHAKRABARTI
SANTOSH KR. MITRA – Appellant
Versus
KALIPADA DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUNA MUKHERJEE, B.C.Mitter, B.K.ROY CHOUDHURY, N.K.MITRA, SAKTI NATH MUKHERJI

B. C. CHAKRABAKTI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are directed against a common judgment disposing of Misc. Case No. 41 of 1962 and Misc. Case No. 10 of 1963 of the 6th Court of learned Subordinate Judge at Alipore.

( 2 ) THE two Misc. Cases arose out of two independent applications for pre-emption under Section 4 of the Partition Act arising out of Title Suit No. 34 of 1959 of the said Court.

( 3 ) SM. Panchanani Dasi defendant No. 4 in the said suit was the petitioner in Misc. Case No. 41 of 1962. The other Misc. Case No. 10 of 1963 was filed by Kalipada Das, defendant No. 3,

( 4 ) THE case of the two petitioners are practically identical. Their case is that the disputed properties namely premises No. 27/1a, Srish Chowdhury Lane, and 6a, Tarak Bose Lane form part of the same house and was the joint family dwelling house of Binodini Dasi and Tinkari Dasi. Binodini made a gift of her 8 annas shares in favour of Manmoth (the original plaintiff) who possessed the same jointly with his sisters, - Shyamasundari, Krishnabhamini, Durgabala and Panchanani. Shyamasundari, Krishnabhamini and Durgabala gifted away their 6 annas shares to the plaintiff and defendants Nos. 1 to 3 by a deed of g
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top