SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 370

UMESH C.BANERJEE
UTPAL BOSE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


UMESH CHANDRA BENERJEE, J.


( 1 ) THE change in the socio-economic condition of the country has resulted in the building construction activity a phemomemal upward trend. To meet the growing demand in the construction of building activity, there was an upsurge of under-qualified persons describing themselves as architects and resulting in unsafe work of construction. The Architects Act, 1972 was engrafted in the Statute Book to provide for the registration of architects so as to eradicate the unqualified and underqualified persons taking upon the responsibility in that regard as architects.

( 2 ) SECTION 25 of the Act of 1972 provides that a person shall be entitled, on payment of a fee as may be prescribed by the Rules, to have his name entered in the register, if he resides or carries on the profession of the architect in India and holds a recognised qualification. S. 29 provides that the Council established in terms of the Act is empowered to remove the name of any architect from the register to be maintained in terms of the provisions of the Act. Retention of the name in the register by payment of fees has also been engrafted in the Statute Book under S. 27 of the Act and in ter





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top