SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 128

K.M.YUSUF
SUKUMAR CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOKE GHOSH, M.BAGCHI, N.C.BANERJI

K. M. YUSUF, J.

( 1 ) THE writ petitioner has challenged the Memo, dated 28th June, 1988 issued by the Assistant Assessor-Collector, Ward No. 93, Tollygung Tax Department, of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation intimating to the petitioner refusing to mutate his name in respect of Premises No. 1/145, Gariahat Road (345, Jodhpur Park), Calcutta-68. The case of the writ petitioner briefly is that the father of the petitioner, Sudeb Sundar Chakraborty since deceased, was a member of Bengal Secretariat Co-operative Land Mortgage Bank and Housing Society Ltd. , a body corporate constituted under the Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1940 (now W. B. Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 ). The Society owned and possessed a big plot of land at Premises No. 1, Gariahat Road, which was sub-divided and distributed amongst its members according to the value of the shares and the father of the petitioner was allotted the Plot No. 345 by the Society whereon he constructed a two-storied building. The father of the petitioner held 20 a' class shares and interests in the said Plot No. 345. The father nominated his elder son, the petitioner, as his nominee and the name of the petitioner was recorded in
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top