PRABIR KUMAR MAJUMDAR
SCRAP MOULD WILL – Appellant
Versus
METAL SCRAP TRADE CORPORATION – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner Scrap Mould entered into a contract with the respondent Metal Trade Corporation Limited on or about 10th June, 1987 for supply of 28,000 MT plus minus shredded scrap at the sellers option. The scrap was intended to be purchased by the respondent as the canalising agent for distribution to various ultimate consumers in the Country.
( 2 ) ONE of the terms and conditions of the said contract between the parties required the petitioner to furnish a performance bond from an approved ink for US Dollars 1,82,280. 00 being 5% of the value of the contract.
( 3 ) IN compliance with the aforesaid requirement the petitioner furnished a bank guarantee issued by Standard Chartered Rank, 4, Netaji Subhas Road, Calcutta for US Dollars 1,82,280.
( 4 ) BY the said bank guarantee, the said Standard Chartered Bank guaranteed that they would indemnify the respondent and/or keep the respondent indemnified against any loss or damage that may be caused to or suffered by the respondent by reason of any breach of contract by the petitioner of any of the terms and conditions of the said contract or performance thereof.
( 5 ) THE relevant portion of the sa
United Commercial Bank v.Bank of India
Centax (India) Ltd.v.Vinmar Impex
National Project Construction Corporation Ltd.v.G.Ranjan
United Commercial Bank v.Hanuman Synthetics Ltd.
M/s.Synthetics Foams Ltd.v.Simplex Concrete Piles (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Road Machines (India) Pvt.Ltd., v.the Project and Equipment Corporation of India Ltd.
D.T.H.Construction v.Steel Authority of India
Banerjee and Banerjee v.Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.