SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 435

MONORANJAN MALLICK
SURENDRA KUMAR NATHANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


MONORANJAN MALLICK, J.


( 1 ) BOTH the matters raise common question of law and facts and have been heard together for reasons of convenience.

( 2 ) THE Matter No. 177 of 1988 has been filed by the owner of the premises No. 135e, F, G and H of Shyama Prosad Mukherjee Road, Calcutta on 15-2-1988 praying for a writ of Mandamus to withdraw, cancel and rescind the purported decision, if there be any, for acquiring the above property either under the Land Acquisition Act or under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 or under the West Bengal Premises (Requisition and Control) (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1947 and to forthwith give quiet, peaceful and vacant possession of the said property to the petitioners.

( 3 ) THIS writ petition has been filed on the following allegations: the premises No. 135e, F, G and H of Shyama Prosad Mukherjee Road, Calcutta has been kept by the Respondent under' requisition by the requisition order No. 62/ 54 dated May 8, 1959 under S. 2 (1) of the West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1947. When even after the expiry of 26 years the Respondent has been using and occupying the property under orders of















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top