MANJULA BOSE
RAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
BENOY KUMAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application for amendment of the plaint wherein the plaintiff claimed a decree inter alia for specific performance of the agreement dt. Aug. 27, 1979 being Annexures B and C to the plaint and/or for a decree directing the defendant No. 1 and/or defendants and/or such of them as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to execute a proper and sufficient conveyance in respect of the suit premises, the particulars whereof are set out in Schedule D to the plaint; a decree for Rs. 10,000/- in addition to the decree for specific performance; in the alternative a decree for Rs. 2,50,000/- as compensation.
( 2 ) THE defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3 have filed a Joint Written Statement, inter alia, alleging that a sum of Rs. 34,500/- payable to the defendants Nos. 2 and 3 by the defendant No. 1 under an agreement, not being paid, the plaintiff was not entitled to get any relief in the suit, relying on the Deed of Partition between the defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3, which provide that the right of the defendants Nos. 2 and 3 to use and enjoy along with the defendant No. 1 any portion of the premises is not absolute, and if the defendant No. 1 or his heirs and lega
REFERRED TO : Debabrata Tarafder v. Biraj Mohan Bardhan
Tarapad Shome v. Parbati Charan Sarkar
Babu Lal v. Hazarilal Kishori Lal
Ganesh Trading Company v. Moji Ram
Kanailal Das v. Jiban Kanai Das
Chimanlal Ambalal v. Shah Hasmukhlal
Mangal Das Sant Ram Gauba v. Union of India
Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal v. National Building Material Supply, Gurgaon
Daulatram Agarwalla v. Champalal Jugraj
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.