SAMARESH BANERJEE
WESTINGHOUSE SAXBY FARMER LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAJ BEHARI RAM – Respondent
( 1 ) IN both the writ application being C. O. No. 4046 (W) of 1988 and C. O. No. 4047 (W) of 1988 the petitioner company namely, Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. has challenged the Award dated 27th September, 1987 passed by the 9th Industrial Tribunal, jointly in case of X-30/82 and X-31/82, which were heard analogously. By the said award it was directed that the dismissal of Shri K. B. Dalrami, workman respondent no. 1 and Shri A. K. Patra, workman respondent no. 2 in C. O. No. 4047 (W) of 1988 and Raj Behari Ram workman respondent no. 1 in C. O. No. 4046 (W) of 1988 are not justified and they are entitled to get reinstatement in their respective services from the date of their dismissal with all back wages, all allowances and all the benefits which they were entitled to get up to this day if they were in service. As Shri A. K. Patra died sometimes in August, 1984 during the pendency of the proceeding before the Tribunal and was substituted by his widow, it was held that his legal heirs were entitled to get the money by way of wages, allowances and other benefits covering into money, according to their respective share from the date from the date of dismissal of A.
Grindlays Bank Limited v. Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Ors.
J.K.Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. L.A.Tribunal of India
United Commercial Bank v. Their Workmen
Calcutta Port Shramik Union v. Calcutta River Transport Association and Ors.
Parry and Co. Ltd. v. P.C. Lal
Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Its Mazdoor Sabha
Sadhu Ram v. Delhi Transport Corpn.
Workmen of English Electric Co. of India Ltd., Madras v. Presiding Officer and Anr.
L.Micheal v. M/s.Jhonson Pump Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.