SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 139

SAMARESH BANERJEE
WESTINGHOUSE SAXBY FARMER LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAJ BEHARI RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMITABHA CHOUDHURY, MOLOY CHAKRAVARTY

S. BANERJEA, J.

( 1 ) IN both the writ application being C. O. No. 4046 (W) of 1988 and C. O. No. 4047 (W) of 1988 the petitioner company namely, Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. has challenged the Award dated 27th September, 1987 passed by the 9th Industrial Tribunal, jointly in case of X-30/82 and X-31/82, which were heard analogously. By the said award it was directed that the dismissal of Shri K. B. Dalrami, workman respondent no. 1 and Shri A. K. Patra, workman respondent no. 2 in C. O. No. 4047 (W) of 1988 and Raj Behari Ram workman respondent no. 1 in C. O. No. 4046 (W) of 1988 are not justified and they are entitled to get reinstatement in their respective services from the date of their dismissal with all back wages, all allowances and all the benefits which they were entitled to get up to this day if they were in service. As Shri A. K. Patra died sometimes in August, 1984 during the pendency of the proceeding before the Tribunal and was substituted by his widow, it was held that his legal heirs were entitled to get the money by way of wages, allowances and other benefits covering into money, according to their respective share from the date from the date of dismissal of A.





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top