SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 11

SATYABRATA SINHA
ANZ GRINDLAYS BANK – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM – Respondent


SATYABRATA SINGH, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ application the petitioners have, inter alia, prayed for issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the proceedings being C. D. F. Case No. 94 of 1994 (Sarita Agarwal v. ANZ Grindlays Bank) pending before the respondent No. 1.

( 2 ) THE fact of the matter lies in a very narrow compass. The respondents Nos. 2 and 3 opened an account for availing banking services under the Cashette Scheme of the petitioner-bank (hereinafter referred to as 'the Bank' ). In terms of the said scheme credit limit/ overdraft limit is allowed to the extent of 50% of the market value of the shares kept with the bank. The respondents Nos. 2 and 3 made a request to the bank for withdrawal of shares of Tube Investment of India Ltd. on 20-9-93. It is admitted that the sanctioned credit limit of the respondents Nos. 2 and 3 was Rs. 73,600. 00- and out of the said amount they utilised a sum of Rs. 61,939. 00.

( 3 ) THE respondent No. 3 on or about 24-9-93 stated that the sale proceeds would be deposited in the bank account as the respondents were in the process of closing the account in view of the deteriorating quality of services of the bank. The said shares, however, w
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top