SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Cal) 156

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, AMAL KANTI BHATTACHARJI
MOUMITA MITRA – Appellant
Versus
RABINDRA NATH BASU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK BANERJI, P.K.DUTT

A. K. BHATTACHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against an order of the Assistant District Judge, fifth court, Alipore by which he ordered the striking out of certain properties from the schedule to the plaint of a partition suit. The facts of the case may be succinctly stated as follows.

( 2 ) THE original plaintiff one Paresh Nath Basu instituted a partition suit against his brother Naresh Chandra Basu, Naresh's son and wife Ramendra Nath Basu and Amala Basu and the plaintiff's mother Sarojini Basu for partition of their undivided properties mentioned in the different schedules to the plaint. The suit was decreed in part by the lower court in the preliminary form. On appeal the first Appellate Court allowed the appear in part and decreed the suit in a preliminary form. The plaintiff got a decree For partition in respect of 5/12th share in the 'ka', a. nd 'ja' schedule properties and half share in respect of 'kha', 'ga', 'gha', 'uma' and 'catha' schedule properties. The plaintiff's claim for partition in respect of 'cha' schedule properties was disallowed. On a second appeal being preferred before the High Court, the said court dismissed the appeal and endor





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top