SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Cal) 84

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, AMAL KANTI BHATTACHARJI
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MAHESWARI ROY – Respondent


BHAGABATI PROSAD BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal filed by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against the order dated 13/12/1989 passed in M. A. C. Case No. 291 of 1987. By the said order the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Jalpaiguri allowed the application filed under S. 92a of the Motor Vehicles Act by which the said Tribunal directed the claimant/opposite party to pay a sum of Rs. 7500. 00 for the loss of right leg of the victum due to motor accident, inasmuch, as, a question of law has been raised in this appeal. We have decided to dispose of that question of law at the very outset by our order dated 12/08/1981. We have decided to adopt this course of action because of the action that the victim had died and his mother was substituted in place and stead of the deceased victim and if the notice was issued, in that event, the mother of the victim may not be in a position to appear and defend this case, that is why, we appointed A. B. Majumder learned Advocate as Amicus Curiae and we should decide the question first, if necessary issue notice.

( 2 ) THE fact in short is that Mahesh Roy was a labourer attached to Truck No. NIN 3054. On 9/07/1987 when he was on the truck and when







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top