YOGESHWAR DAYAL, A. S. ANAND, J. S. VERMA, M. H. KANIA, S. C. AGRAWAL
Rajalakshmi Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
Margaret Kathleen Gandhi (Mrs) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M. H. KANIA, C.J.I. :—Leave granted. Counsel heard.
2. This appeal is directed against an interim order passed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 387 of 1988 on May 4, 1988.
3. On 9th December, 1987 a formal agreement to sell the property in question to respondent No. 1 was signed by the appellant and his co-vendor, respondent No. 8 for a total consideration of Rs. 18 lacs, out of which Rs. 50,000/- was already paid to them in November, 1987. A further amount of Rupees one lac and fifty thousand was received by the vendors from the first respondent in February, 1988. As a security for the said amount the first respondent was put in possession of a portion of the property and she continues to be in possession of the same till date. On February 10, 1988 the appellant entered into an agreement for the purchase of a flat in Alaknanda, New Delhi for a total consideration of Rupees six lacs and seventy five thousand, out of which Rs. 20,000 /- was paid as earnest money. On March 14, 1988, the Appropriate Authority under Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 passed an order directing the purchase of the said property by the Central Government
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.