SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Cal) 231

S.K.SEN, VINOD KUMAR GUPTA
ASIT KUMAR DASGUPTA, C. M. M. , CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIKASH RANJAN BHATTACHARJI, NANDINI MITRA, SYED SHAHID IMAN

SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the Contempt Rule issued by learned single Judge of this Court. The appellant is the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate of Calcutta. Before issuing the Contempt Rule, the learned single Judge also issued a show cause notice. The circumstances under which the said notice to show cause before issuing contempt Rule was issued as appears from the said notice is set out hereinunder :"this is to record that sometime back in the last part of February this year between 16-2-1996 and 23-2-1996, Shri Asit Kumar Dasgupta, a member of the West Bengal Higher Judicial Service, posted as Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta while talking to me over phone at my chamber in a most objectionable, intemperate, annoying and insulting language criticised the move of the High Court and the order of the present Chief Justice calling for copies of judgments delivered by him and few other members of the service for considering their eligibility for granting extension of service beyond 58 years. He asked me to see that copies of judgments were not called for and to tell the Chief Justice that he should not take the matter as in the domain of his fath







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top