SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 184

RUMA PAL, MALAY KUMAR BASU
RECKITT AND COLMAN OF INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
JYOTHI LABORATORIES LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.BOSH, P.CHINDAMBARAM, S.N.MUKHERJEE, SUDIPTA SARKAR

( 1 ) THE Court :-The appellant manufactures ultra marine indigo (neel) both in liquid and powder form under the trade name of Robin Blue (referred to as the product ). The product is used for whitening fabric. The respondent No. 1 also sells a whitening agent which is an "insta violate concentrate" under the trade name 'ujala'. The respondent No. 2 is the respondent No. 1's advertising agency.

( 2 ) THIS is the third round in a tussle between the respondent No. 1 and the appellant with regard to the advertisements issued by the respondent No. 1 to promote its product. The first was in respect of a printed advertisement which was in Bengali. The Advertisement gave reasons why neel should never be used. This advertisement was the subject matter of a suit in this court. An exparte interim order was passed restraining the publication of the advertisement. This was confirmed after the filing of affidavits on 24th March, 1998. According to the respondent No. 1, pursuant to this order that particular advertisement was not being published in the earlier manner. According to the appellant even in its present form the advertisement continued to disparage the appellant's product.

( 3 ) THE





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top