SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 193

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
ALAKH KUMAR SINHA – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE Court : Heard counsel for the parties. This appeal is filed impugning a judgment dated 4th October, 1993 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court on an application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The learned single Judge dismissed the application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, inter alia, holding that there has been an unauthorised inflation of the claim by the claimant so as to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. The learned Judge also made certain observations while dealing with the application under section 20 of the Act to the extent that if the Insurance Company pays the claimant a sum of Rs. 12,005/- within four weeks thereof, that will amount to satisfaction of the claim of the claimant.

( 2 ) WE, however, do not agree with the approach adopted by the learned single Judge in disposing of the section 20 application, though we find that there has been an unauthorised inflation of the claim by the claimant.

( 3 ) THIS Court finds that the particulars of the claim in this case have been given in paragraph 7 (at page 9) of the claim petition. The said claims are set out below: particulars: 1. Loss to the vehicle due to accident - Rs























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top