SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 555

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
JAGAT BANDHU BATABAYAL – Appellant
Versus
JIBAN KRISHNA ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAL KANTI GHOSHAL, ANIRUDDHA CHATTERJEE

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.

( 1 ) THE instant Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant-tenant and is directed against judgment and decree passed by the Learned 4th Court of Additional District Judge, Alipore in Title Appeal No. 436 of 1992 reversing the judgment and decree passed by the Learned Munsif, 3rd Court, Alipore in Title Suit No. 189 of 1979.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the landlord and is the respondent in the present appeal. The plaintiff filed a suit for ejectment against the defendant who was inducted according to the plaintiff as a monthly tenant in respect of the suit property at a monthly rent of Rs. 80. 00. It has also been stated by the plaintiff that he is the owner of the suit property wherein the defendant was inducted as tenant. According to the plaintiff, defendant damaged a bedroom within his tenancy and has failed and neglected to pay the rent since the month of November, 1978. It has also been stated by the plaintiff that he requires the suit property for the use and occupation of himself and other members of his family.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff his present accommodation is most insufficient and inadequate and the rooms under the tenancy of the




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top