SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 731

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
BIMALENDU CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
SARITA CHHYAJLANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHASKAR GHOSH, G.C.Ghosh, S.BASU

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) BY this revisional application, applicants under Section 4 of the Partition Act ("act") have challenged an order dated june 30, 1999 passed by the learned civil Judge, Senior Division, 4th court, Alipore in Misc. Case No. 72 of 1994 thereby rejecting an application under Section 4 of the Act filed by the petitioners.

( 2 ) THERE is no dispute that a suit for partition being Title Suit No. 23 of 1976 filed by some of the co-sharers of the petitioners was finally decreed on June 17, 1982. The present petitioner No. 1 was defendant No. 7 and the petitioner No. 2 is the son of the original defendant No. 2 of the said suit. The opposite party No. 1. an admitted stranger, by two different sale deeds dated September 11, 1993 and june 5, 1994 purchased Lot No. A allotted to the plaintiff Nos. 3 and 5 having 2/7th share and Lot No. B fallen to the plaintiff Nos. 4 and 6 having equal share respectively. After such purchase, the opposite party No. 1 started an execution case being Title execution Case No. 13 of 1994 for recovery of possession of her purchased portion by executing the final decree of partition passed in favour of her vendors.

( 3 ) THE present




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top