SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 460

D.K.SETH
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
MADHUMITA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEPANKAR GHOSH, Gautam Chakraborty, M.RAJASEKHAR REDDY, SUDIPTO SARKAR

D. K. SETH, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF has made this application for : (i) appointment of receiver in respect of the assets and properties, books of accounts and records of the respondents no. 1 to 52 including movable assets with appropriate directions; (ii) injunction restraining the respondents No. 1 to 52 from disposing of or parting with possession", transfer, encumbering or dealing with their assets, profits including those mentioned in annexure "g" to the plaint without making the payments due to the plaintiff/petitioner; (iii) decree on admission against the respective respondents mentioned in prayer (d) and for consequential reliefs; (iv) filing of affidavits, directing disclosure of the amount received by the said respondents from different branches; (v) injunction restraining the respondents No. 53 to 57 from demanding any money from the petitioner in relation to the alleged void Letters of Credits (LCs) purported to have been negotiated by them through unjustified and fraudulent transactions; or (vi) to demand any money or in any way dealing with or to exercise any right, title or interest in respect of any of the LCs issued by the petitioners branches including Bag Bazar Branc




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top