ASIT KUMAR BISI
DINWARA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
AMITAVA BANERJEE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE instant revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India preferred by the petitioner is directed against Order No. 15 dated 16-1-2001 passed by the leaned Civil Judge (Senior Division) 9th Court, Alipore, South 24-Parganas in T. S. No. 1 of 2000. By the impugned order the learned trial Court rejected the application under Order 7 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the defendant/ petitioner.
( 2 ) THE facts leading to the instant revisional application may briefly be stated thus, The defendant/petitioner filed an application under Order 7 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure which has arisen out of the suit for recovery of khas possession, mesne profits and damages valued at Rs. 30,200/- i. e. , Rs. 7,200/- for recovery of khas possession, Rs. 10,000/- as mesne profits and Rs. 13,000/- as damages tentatively. It has been contended by the defendant/petitioner that in a suit like the present one a landlord cannot claim mesne profits for any period prior to a decree for possession and as such the claim for mesne profits as made by the plaintiff/opposite party prior to a decree for possession, is barred by law. It has been f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.