SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 69

A.K.SEN, SUDHIR RANJAN ROY
W. B. C. A. DEVELOPMENT CORPN. – Appellant
Versus
SASANKA SEKHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BANKIM CHANDRA DUTT, Mrinal Kanti Das, SUNDERLAL NAYAK

SUDHIR RANJAN ROY, J.

( 1 ) AN abortive application for stay under S. 34 of the Arbitration Act is the genesis of the instant appeal by the defendants.

( 2 ) THE defendant No. 1 the West Bengal Comprehensive Area Development Corporation, a statutory body (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) invited tenders for construction of "field channel" at village Upar-Gugui and Mahultaur I and II in the district of Purulia against a tender notice dated February 29, 1981. The plaintiff, Sasanka Sekhar Banerjee (respondent), a contractor, submitted a tender with all formalities which was ultimately accepted by the defendant No. 1. A printed contract form was executed by and between the plaintiff and the defendant No. 1 on the 1st day of June, 1981.

( 3 ) CLAUSE 25 in the said printed agreement provides for settlement of all disputes arising out of the contract by referring the same to the sole arbitration of the Executive Vice-Chairman of the Corporation or to an Arbitrator to be appointed by him if he is unable or unwilling to act.

( 4 ) A dispute having arisen between the parties over execution of the contract and consequent alleged non-payment of the final bill of the plaintiff a















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top