A.K.SEN, SUDHIR RANJAN ROY
W. B. C. A. DEVELOPMENT CORPN. – Appellant
Versus
SASANKA SEKHAR – Respondent
( 1 ) AN abortive application for stay under S. 34 of the Arbitration Act is the genesis of the instant appeal by the defendants.
( 2 ) THE defendant No. 1 the West Bengal Comprehensive Area Development Corporation, a statutory body (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) invited tenders for construction of "field channel" at village Upar-Gugui and Mahultaur I and II in the district of Purulia against a tender notice dated February 29, 1981. The plaintiff, Sasanka Sekhar Banerjee (respondent), a contractor, submitted a tender with all formalities which was ultimately accepted by the defendant No. 1. A printed contract form was executed by and between the plaintiff and the defendant No. 1 on the 1st day of June, 1981.
( 3 ) CLAUSE 25 in the said printed agreement provides for settlement of all disputes arising out of the contract by referring the same to the sole arbitration of the Executive Vice-Chairman of the Corporation or to an Arbitrator to be appointed by him if he is unable or unwilling to act.
( 4 ) A dispute having arisen between the parties over execution of the contract and consequent alleged non-payment of the final bill of the plaintiff a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.