If the application for a certified copy of the decree is made after the expiry of the limitation period, the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act for excluding the time taken for obtaining a certified copy in computing the limitation period for filing an appeal.

( 1 ) IN 1982 the appellant/petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') filed a suit against the defendants/ respondents (hereinafter referred to as the respondents'), inter alia, for recovery of Rs. 3,54,050. 42 paise, interim interest, interest on judgment and other reliefs. On 3rd Sept. , 1984 a decree was passed by Mrs. Pratibha Bonnerjea, J. On 5th Sept. , 1984 the requisition for drawing up and to complete the decree was given on behalf of the petitioner. On 15th Sept. , 1984, the matter was mentioned for modification of the said decree. On and from 27th Sept. , 1984 the High Court closed for Puja vacation and it reopened on 29th Oct. , 1984. On 30th Oct. , 1984 requisition for certified copy of the decree dt. 3rd Sept. , 1984 was given to Court's Department on behalf of the petitioner. On 18th Jan. 1985 the draft decree was settled and passed before the Senior Master. On 30th Jan. , 1985 memorandum of appeal was filed on behalf of the petitioner. In the aforesaid circumstances the petitioner has made the instant application, inter alia, for the following prayer:"one day's delay in making the application for certified copy of the decree be condoned and the time for the same be extended till Oct. 30, 1984".

( 2 ) IT is stated by the petitioner that the decree has been settled but the certified copy of the decree and judgment is not yet available. For explaining the delay it is stated by the petitioner that it took decision to file an appeal against the decree regarding grant of interest and accordingly, by its letter dt. 22nd Oct. , 1984 and received by its Advocates-on-Record on 24th Oct. , 1984 the petitioner instructed its Advocates-on-Record to take steps for filing of the appeal. The petitioner's Advocates on-Record, accordingly, instructed its clerk to file requisition for obtaining the certified copy of the decree on the reopening day of the Court after Puja vacation, that is, on 29th Oct. 1984. The clerk of the petitioner's Advocates-on-Record undertook to do the same on the reopening day of the Court after Puja vacation However, the clerk of the petitioner's Advocates-on-Record, Sri Gobinda Pal, did not attend the office on the reopening day without any prior intimation. Thereafter, on the next day, that is, on 30th October, 1984 the petitioner's Advocate in charge of the matter himself took steps and filed the requisition for certified copy of the decree in the Court's Department.

( 3 ) ONE Gobinda Pal, the clerk of the petitioner's Advocates-on-Record has filed an affidavit affirmed by him on the 25th Feb. 1985. In the affidavit it is stated that on 24th Oct. 1984 he was instructed by Mr. Das, Advocate of the firm of the petitioner's Advocates-on-Record to put in requisition for certified copy of the decree for preferring an appeal against the decree dt. 3rd Sept. , 1984 on the reopening day, i. e. , on 29th Oct. , 1984 after the long vacation and he undertook to do the same. It is further stated that he is a permanent resident of Nabadwip and is a daily passenger and attends office from Nabadwip by train. It is also stated that on 29th Oct. 1984 he could not attend office owing to the serious illness and being bed-ridden he was not in a position to contact the office from such a remote distance and as such he could not intimate the office to put in requisition for a certified copy of the decree.

( 4 ) IN the affidavit-in-opposition it is stated that there is no time limit for applying for a certified copy of the decree or order of a Court and as such the question of delay or condonation thereof does not and cannot arise. It is further stated that in the instant case there is no question of one day's delay but there is considerable delay in filing the appeal of about 155 days which remains totally unexplained. It is further stated that putting in requisition for the certified copy of an order or decree beyond the period of limitation prescribed for the filing of the appeal theref