SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 354

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, MONJULA BOSE
L. N. BIRLA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.Bhattacharji, KHAITAN, R.N.BAJORIA

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) L. N. Birla, the assessee, was assessed to wealth-tax in the assessment years 1972-73, 1973-74 and 1974-75, the valuation dates being 31st of March of the calendar years 1972, 1973 and 1974. The assessee was a partner of a firm named M/s. Kumaon Orchards. The assessee had l/5th share in the said firm. The firm owned agricultural lands. In his return of net wealth, the assessee claimed exemption under Section 5 (1) (iva) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, in respect of his share of the agricultural land of the firm. The Wealth-tax Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that the asset to be included in the assessee's net wealth was 1/5th share of the interest of the assessee in the said firm and not the land as such.

( 2 ) BEING aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal against the assessments before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Wealth-tax. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that in determining the net wealth of the firm, exemption under Section 5 (1) (iva) of the Wealth-tax Act should be allowed up to the admissible limit. But the benefit of the said section could not be given to each of the partners separately. He direct




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top