SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Cal) 304

BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK, SATYABRATA MITRA
HEMANTA KUMAR CHAUDHURY – Appellant
Versus
SUMITRA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.BACHAVAT, BARIN GHOSH, P.CHATTERJI, P.K.GHOSH, P.K.ROY

BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK, J.

( 1 ) - This is an application for review of our judgment, dated 5th May, 1987, on the ground mentioned in the Memorandum of Review. The same are also stated in the petition.

( 2 ) WE are setting out the facts of this case from our judgment, review of which is sought for. These facts are not disputed and not under challenge in this application. The petition for grant of Probate was filed by one Smt. Sumitra Devi claiming herself to be a residual beneficiary under the last Will of the one Gajanand Chaudhury (hereinafter referred to as the Testator ). It was stated in the petition that the testator died on 9th October 1973 at No. 2/2a, Harrington Street, Calcutta within the jurisdiction of this Court. It was stated that the testator, during his life time, used to visit, from time to time and stay at his residential house at Sahabad Gate Hathras District Aligarh in the State of Uttar Pradesh where he had also considerable properties. Having regard to the importance of the averments made in paragraphs 4 and 6 of the said petition, we set out the same verbatim hereinbelow. "on the 4th day of March 1972 the deceased above named executed at Hathras outside the af































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top