M. G. MUKHERJI, NRIPENDRA KUMAR BHATTACHARYYA

( 1 ) THIS Rule being Civil Rule No. 422 (M) of 1992 has been issued by a Division Bench of this Court asking the respondent opposite parties who are the claimants before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to show-cause as to why the implementation of the award dated 16. 9. 91 in MAC Case No. 166 of 1990 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Midnapore should not be stayed till the disposal of the appeal and such further order/orders should not be made as to the Court may deem fit and proper.

( 2 ) BY an order dated 13. 3. 92 the implementation of the award in MAC Case No. 166 of 1990 was stayed. We have heard Mr. Ajit Bhusan Majumdar for the appellant petitioner and Mr. P. B. Sahu for the respondent and Mr. Biswajit Chowdhury, Senior Advocate as amicus curiae.

( 3 ) THERE is an application for analogous hearing of the present appeal along with FMAT 176 of 1992 filed by the appellant where Parvati Dehari filed a claim on account of the death of her son Danga Dehari in the self same accident. Another claim was filed by Chabi Khamroi claiming compensation for the death of her husband Badal Khamroi in the said accident. In each of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document