SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 52

N.K.BHATTACHARYYA
SUSHIL KUMAR JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ABHIJIT CHATTERJI, Supriya Ranjan Saha, UTPAL BOSE

NRIPENDRA KUMAR BHATTACHARYYA, J.


( 1 ) THE main revisional application is taken up for hearing along with the application for interim order in view of the Court's order dated 6-2-1996 Both the matters are disposed of by the following order.

( 2 ) HEARD the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Abhijit Chatterjee appearing with the learned Advocate Mr. Supriya Ranjan Saha and the learned Advocate for the opposite party No. 1, Bank of India, Mr. Utpal Bose appearing with the learned Advocate Mr. Bidyut Kumar Banerjee. Mr. Banerjee undertakes to file his Vakalatnama on behalf of the Bank of India in course of this day. Let that undertaking be recorded. Considered the materials on record. The Power filed in Court just now be kept on record. By the instant application under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the judgment and/or final order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal on 3rd August, 1995, in Original Application No. 86 of 1994, by which the Tribunal adjudged the petitioners as debtors and further held that the applicant-Bank is entitled to realise a sum of Rs. 10,08,889. 73 from the petitioners. This judgment and/or f










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top