N.K.BHATTACHARYYA
SUSHIL KUMAR JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE main revisional application is taken up for hearing along with the application for interim order in view of the Court's order dated 6-2-1996 Both the matters are disposed of by the following order.
( 2 ) HEARD the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Abhijit Chatterjee appearing with the learned Advocate Mr. Supriya Ranjan Saha and the learned Advocate for the opposite party No. 1, Bank of India, Mr. Utpal Bose appearing with the learned Advocate Mr. Bidyut Kumar Banerjee. Mr. Banerjee undertakes to file his Vakalatnama on behalf of the Bank of India in course of this day. Let that undertaking be recorded. Considered the materials on record. The Power filed in Court just now be kept on record. By the instant application under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the judgment and/or final order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal on 3rd August, 1995, in Original Application No. 86 of 1994, by which the Tribunal adjudged the petitioners as debtors and further held that the applicant-Bank is entitled to realise a sum of Rs. 10,08,889. 73 from the petitioners. This judgment and/or f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.