SATYA NARAYAN CHAKRABARTY, SATYABRATA SINHA
GAJENDRA KUMAR BANTHIA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to release Jitendra Kumar Banthia, the father of the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as "the detenu"), who is said to have been detained in civil prison by respondent No. 2 in purported exercise of his jurisdiction under Section 222 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with the relevant rules contained in the Second Schedule appended thereto.
( 2 ) THE detenu has been carrying on the business of jute and distributorship in cinematographic films. Allegedly because of losses suffered by the detenu, he could not pay his income-tax dues to the extent of a sum of Rs. 75 lakhs and odd. It is not disputed that the detenu who was being assessed under the provisions of the said Act, even did not file his income-tax returns after 1986 allegedly on the ground that he did not have taxable income. On February 23, the detenu was arrested and on that date itself he was sent to Alipore Central Jail by respondent No. 2 purportedly in the exercise of his powers under the provision of Rule 76 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act. The petitioner has contended that the de
Laxmi Narain Anand Prakash v. CST
Purshottam Govindji Hahai v. Shree B.M.Desai, Additional Collector of Bombay
Collector of Malabar v. Erimmal Ebrahim, Hajee
Dr. B.Ramachandra Rao v. State of Orissa
CIT v. Kurban Hussain Ibrahimji Mithiborwala
Mahmed Akhtar Husein v. State of Gujarat
Hari Prasad Agarwalla v. State of Bihar
Nirendra Kumar Bose v. District Magistrate
S.N.Mukherjee v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.