SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1027

J. S. VERMA, M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, S. MOHAN
Ravinder Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
G.K.BANSAL, T.S.ARORA

JUDGMENT

MOHAN, J.:- The facts lie in a narrow compass.

The appellant No. 1 Smt. Ravinder Sharma was appointed as a clerk in the Punjap Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) through Employment Exchange on 8-6-1967. At that time, she possessed the educational qualification as Matriculate III Class while the rule required Matriculate I class. Later on, she qualified from the Subordinate Service Selection Board and was appointed as a clerk on regular basis on 28-8-1968. She was promoted as Assistant on 1-2-1974.

2. Appellant No. 2, Surjit Singh was appointed as Clerk in the Commission through the Employment Exchange on 8-6-1967. He had passed Higher Secondary Examination in III Division. After qualifying from the Selection Board, he was appointed as a Clerk on regular basis on 28-8-1968. He was further promoted as Assistant on 26-6-1974. Since the second appellant has died, his case need not be considered.

3. The appellant did not possess the requisite qualification as required under Regn. 7 of the Punjab Public Service Commission (State Service Class III) Regulations, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the `Regulations) . Therefore, the Commission recommend






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top