SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 534

MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI, JOYTOSH BANERJEE
KAJAL ROY – Appellant
Versus
PRASANTA KR. ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Boddhadev GhosaI, TAPAN MUKHERJI

M. H. S. ANSARI, J.

( 1 ) INSTANT appeal is field by defendant-wife aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated September 21, 2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Howrah in Matrimonial Suit No. 37 of 1994. Thereby the suit for divorce filed on the ground of cruelty by the husband was decreed.

( 2 ) A perusal of the judgment under appeal would show that the petition under section 13 was filed by the husband praying for a decree of divorce under section 13 on the ground of cruelty and desertion. Learned trial Court found that the ground of desertion is not established and with regard to the ground of cruelty it was noticed that the same was founded on the ground that the wife left the matrimonial home at regular intervals and used to come back after 15/20 days and that she refused cohabitation with the husband and that finally on November 13, 1993 she left the matrimonial home with bag and baggage without the consent and knowledge of the petitioner and against the will of the husband's mother. Learned trial Court found that the factum of cruelty pleaded has not been established but was of the view that the marital tie has deteriorated to such an extent that the part




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top