MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI, JOYTOSH BANERJEE
KAJAL ROY – Appellant
Versus
PRASANTA KR. ROY – Respondent
( 1 ) INSTANT appeal is field by defendant-wife aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated September 21, 2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Howrah in Matrimonial Suit No. 37 of 1994. Thereby the suit for divorce filed on the ground of cruelty by the husband was decreed.
( 2 ) A perusal of the judgment under appeal would show that the petition under section 13 was filed by the husband praying for a decree of divorce under section 13 on the ground of cruelty and desertion. Learned trial Court found that the ground of desertion is not established and with regard to the ground of cruelty it was noticed that the same was founded on the ground that the wife left the matrimonial home at regular intervals and used to come back after 15/20 days and that she refused cohabitation with the husband and that finally on November 13, 1993 she left the matrimonial home with bag and baggage without the consent and knowledge of the petitioner and against the will of the husband's mother. Learned trial Court found that the factum of cruelty pleaded has not been established but was of the view that the marital tie has deteriorated to such an extent that the part
TriSmt. Nivedita Banerjee v. Sanal Kumar Banerjee
Referred to : Savitri Pandey v. Prem Chandra Pandey
Smt. Kakali Das (Ghosh) v. Dr. Asish Kumar Das
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research and Anr. v. A.P. Wasan and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.