SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 536

P.N.SINHA
PARTHA MAJUMDAR – Appellant
Versus
SHARMISTHA MAJUMDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajit Kumar Panja, Sabita Bandopadhyay, Tanushree Ghosh

P. N. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE instant revisional application has been filed by the husband petitioner under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter called the Code) assailing the order dated 29-9-2003 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 5th Court, Barrackpore in Misc. Case No. 212 of 2002 thereby refusing the prayers of the petitioner for DNA Test of petitioner, his wife, male child and one Sankar Biswas and also to accept supplementary written objection filed by him and to pass order that this petitioner is not pressing the previous written objection tiled by him.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case giving rise to the instant revisional application, as disclosed in the revisional application, in brief, are as follows : the petitioner was married with O. P. No. 1 on 12-2-2001 and thereafter on 26-2-2001 the petitioner took away his wife to his working place at Madhya Pradesh for leading marital life. The O. P. wile developed an illicit and adultery relationship with one Sankar Biswas, one of his colleagues and his wife used to enjoy frequent visit of Sankar Biswas at his quarter during his absence. One day after going back from office he f


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top