SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 278

KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA, ARUN KUMAR BHATTACHARYA
ASHOK KUMAR SABOO – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTHAN PAPER CORPORATION LIMITED – Respondent


K. J. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS was an appeal against judgment and order dated 8th September, 2005 passed by the learned Single Judge who dismissed the writ petition holding that this Court has no territorial jurisdiction. The writ petition was dismissed on receipt of affidavit on the question of jurisdiction. Naturally learned Trial Judge did not proceed to decide the writ petition on merit. The fact of the case made out in the writ petition is that there have been two agreements for sale and supply of raw materials viz. bamboo, hard wood, bamboo chips for manufacturing papers. One was entered into by and between one M/s. Durga Trading represented by its sole proprietor, Sri Kishore Saboo, the eighth respondent and the respondent No. 1 and another was concluded later between first respondent by the second petitioner and the first respondent. The petitioner No. 2 and the respondent No. 8 are closely related to each other. In terms of both the contracts raw materials were to be delivered at the factory of the first respondent situate at Kagajnagar in the State of Assam. However, disputes and grievances are primarily concerned with the contract between the petitioners and the responde





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top