DIPANKAR DATTA
MADHULATA KANKANI – Appellant
Versus
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
( 2 ) MR. Chakraborty and Mr. Das Adhikari, learned Counsel for the corporation and the private respondents respectively, at the outset, raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the present petition. They contended that section 415 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, provides a forum for appeal against any order passed under section 400 thereof and, therefore, the petitioner ought to be relegated to the Building Tribunal. It has also been submitted by them that the exception (s) which would justify interference despite availability of an alternative remedy being non-existent in t
REFERRED TO : A.P.Foods vs. S. Samuel
Ashok Kumar Sonkar vs. Union of India
Hindusthan Steel Works Construction Limited vs. Hindusthan Steel Works Construction Employees Union
Laddu Gopal Bajoria vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation
Ramchandra Keshav Adke vs. Govind Joti Chavare
Sovachand Mulchand vs. Collector of Central Excise
Appropriate Authority vs. Sudha Patil
H.P.Electricity Regulatory Commission vs. H. P. State Electricity Board
P. O. Agarwal vs. State Bank of India
State Bank of Patiala vs. S. K. Sharma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.