SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 91

DILIP KUMAR BASU, NIRENDRA KRISHNA MITRA
AMAL KRISHNA ADITYA – Appellant
Versus
GANESH CHANDRA DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAL SAHA, M.K.DAS, S.DAS GUPTA, SOMNATH GHOSE

N. K. MITRA, J, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by the defendant/appellant against the judgment and decree dated 13th February, 1985, passed in favour of the plaintiff/respondent by the learned Judge, VIII Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta, in Ejectment Suit No. 2 of 976.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff/respondent filed Ejectment Suit No. 2 of 1976 in the City Civil Court at Calcutta against the defendant/appellant for his eviction from one room on the first floor and one room and a kitchen on the second floor of the premises No. 33/c, Haralal Das Lane, Calcutta-700 006, (hereinafter referred to as the 'suit premises') inter alia, on the ground of reasonable requirement.

( 3 ) THE case as made out by the plaintiff/respondent the plaint inter alia, was that the plaintiff/respondent was the owner of the suit premises and the defendant/appellant was a monthly tenant under him in respect of one room on the first floor and one room and a kitchen on the second floor at a rental of Rs. 20/- per month payable according to the English Calendar. The suit premises was reasonably required by the plaintiff/respondent for his own use and occupation and also for the use and occupation of his fami

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top