SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 192

PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, TAPAN KUMAR DUTT
SUBIR GUHATHAKURTA – Appellant
Versus
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARESH RAY, ARIJIT BANERJI, ARUNAVA GHOSH, PARTHA SARATHI SENGUPTA

P. C. GHOSE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is arising out of an order dated 6th january. 2005 whereby the Hon'ble First Court was pleased to set aside the order and/or Judgment passed by the learned Tribunal.

( 2 ) FACTS of the case briefly are as follows: appellant was appointed by the respondent company as a Medical service Representative (hereinafter referred to as MSR) on probation at a monthly salary of Rs. 250/ -. On 27th June, 1973 such appointment was confirmed by the company (respondent No. 1) and subsequent thereto appellant was promoted as Field Sales Officers on or about 24th december, 1981 and thereafter on 1st January, 1986 promoted to the post of Sales Trainee Officer. On or about January 1, 1988 he was promoted to the post of District Manager in the Junior Management staff Cadre. Subsequent thereto, he was promoted to the post of Zonal manager with effect from 1st October, 1990. It further appears that on 1st April, 1994 respondent by virtue of a Scheme of Amalgamation sanctioned by the Bombay High Court amalgamated with a company, which is a subsidiary company Ethinor Limited and the appellant became the employee of the respondent company with effect from 1st april, 1994






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top