SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 53

AMIT TALUKDAR
TAPAS SUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PMAKI BHATTACHARJEE, RUPNA BHATTACHARJEE (RAY)

AMIT TALUKDAR, J.


( 1 ) "the horizons of Article 21 are ever widening and the final word on its conspectus shall never have been said. So long as life lasts, so long shall it be the duty and endeavour of this Court to give to the provisions of our Constitution a meaning which will prevent human suffering and degradation", was held by Y. V. Chandrachud. The Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India presiding over a 3-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Sher Singh v. State of Punjab held on AIR 1983 SC 465.

( 2 ) KEEPING in mind, the aforesaid hallowed observations this Court proceed to evaluate the grievance of the petitioner, who feels that in his case the said Fundamental Right has stood in breach.

( 3 ) THIS Court is now entrusted with to sort out the agony of the petitioner, who feels that his valuable right under Article 21 of the Constitution has been breached in the proceedings of N-10 of 2000 pending before the learned Special Court (under the N. D. P. S. Act), Barasat as he has been in custody for a period more than what is permissible under the law.

( 4 ) LEARNED Counsel appearing in support of the application has submitted that since the amount involved in the present case is














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top