SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 376

ALOKE CHAKRABARTI, S.P.TALUKDAR
ASSOCIATION OF WEST BENGAL SECRETARIAT ASSISTANTS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JOYDIP KAR, K.ROY, R.BASU, SADHAN ROY CHAUDHARY

S. P. TALUKDAR, J.

( 1 ) THE present application under Article 226 of the constitution of India is directed against the Judgment dated 6th september, 2002 passed by the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal, hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal' in O. A. No. 2899 of 1999. Grievances of the petitioners may briefly be stated as follows:

( 2 ) THE petitioners approached the Tribunal with the grievance that while fixing the quantum of House Rent Allowance of the Secretariat employees posted at Calcutta, the respondent/state authorities committed discrimination. It was alleged that the State Government employees posted at New Delhi were getting 30% House Rent Allowance and after declaration of Calcutta as 'a-1' city, the Secretariat employees should get H. R. A. at the same rate, i. e. , 30% H. R. A. It was contended that previously the Secretariat employees were getting more H. R. A. but, subsequently, the same was brought at par with all the employees of the State Government. It was further claimed that by fixing the quantum of H. R. A. at a flat rate of 15% the Government authorities committed discrimination in treating the Secretariat employees at par with other State Government























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top