Pratap Kumar Ray, J.

1. THE Judgment of the Court was delivered by Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

2. ASSAILING the order dated 8th May, 2009 passed by the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 719 of 2005, this writ application has been filed. The impugned order reads such. Case No. OA-719 of 2005 Order No.08 Dtd: 08-05-09. We have heard both Mr. Banerjee and Mr. Karim, representing the respective parties in connection with this application filed by one Dilip Kr. Sahu. The petitioner filed this application after receipt of second show cause notice which was served on him on receipt of the enquiry report by the disciplinary authority and we further get from the file that petitioner already replied to the said second show cause notice. The petitioner faced the departmental proceeding on a number of charges related to the allegation of acquisition of asset disproportionate to his known source of income. We find from record and papers, produced by the petitioner himself, that petitioner participated in the proceeding and the enquiring officer, after considering both oral and documentary evidence, submitted a report holding inter alia that all th