SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 903

HARISH TANDAN
Md. Kamruddin – Appellant
Versus
Khurshida Bibi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Siva Prasad Ghosh, Halder Tarak Nath

JUDGMENT

1. THIS revisional application is directed against Order No. 17 dated 17th February 2010 passed by the Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Sealdah in Title Suit No. 7 of 2009 by which an application for amendment, filed by the defendant/appellant, is rejected.

2. THE plaintiff/opposite party instituted an eviction suit, being Title Suit No. 38 of 1996, on the ground of default and own use and occupation. In paragraph 4 of the plaint, the plaintiff/opposite party categorically asserted that they are the absolute owners of the suit property.

3. IN the written statement, the defendant/ petitioner evasively denied such statement in contending that the plaintiff is not the owner of the property. No where in the written statement it was ever asserted by the defendant/petitioner that apart from him there are other heirs who have inherited the said tenancy. In paragraph 12 of the written statement, it has been categorically stated by the defendant/petitioner that he is still the tenant of the suit property. The parties adduced evidence. No where in the evidence the Court could find out that any case of non-joinder of necessary party is made out. After the suit was decreed, the defendan

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top