SANJIB BANERJEE, M.S.SHAH, SOUMITRA PAL
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
Sati Enclave Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Shah, C.J :
1. THE judgment of the Court was as follows:-
THE question referred by the Division Bench for our opinion is:-
"Whether the provisions contained in Section 47A of the Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act read with Rule 3 of the West Bengal Stamp (Prevention of Under-valuation of Instruments) Rules, 2001 are applicable to an instrument executed pursuant to an order of sale passed by a Civil Court in a suit for partition which is conducted by a Receiver appointed by the Civil Court, by auction, after publication in newspapers."
2. FOLLOWING the above reference, a learned Single Judge of this Court has also referred the following question for our consideration:-
"Whether the consideration money fetched for sale of a property in course of liquidation proceedings before the Company Court upon re-advertisement, falling short of the reserve price mentioned in the initial advertisement, or the price so fetched although higher than the reserve price but in the opinion of the registering authority is lower than the market value determinable under Rule 3 of the West Bengal Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 2001, should be treated to be the marke
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.