Pratap Kumar Ray, J.

Heard the learned advocates appearing for the parties.

2. Assailing the interlocutory order dated 29th May, 2012 passed in W.P. 11192 (W) of 2012 on the grievance that learned trial Judge did not pass any interim order staying the notice issued by prescribed authority under West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘said Act’) convening date of meeting for consideration of motion of removal of the present appellant who is an Office Bearer being Sahakari Sabhapati of Kandi Panchayat Samiti, this appeal has been preferred.

3. Connected application for appropriate order has been moved. A supplementary affidavit in connection with said application has been filed.

4. Prayer for appropriate order restraining respondents from taking any steps or further steps for removal of appellant from said post until disposal of the application and direction to the respondent authority to dispose of the complaints filed by the present appellant against five members of the said Panchayat Samiti referring disqualification clause for their removal as members as made, is now to be considered. In doing such we have to consider entire lis dealing with appeal an