Mahitosh Majumdar
Gobardhan Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
Abani Mohan Chakraborty – Respondent
These appeals are directed against the judgment and decree dated June 10, 1972 passed by the Additional District Judge, 10th Court, Alipore, in Title Appeal Nos. 593 of 1971 and 553 of 1971 affirming those dated April 30, 1971 passed by the Munsif, 3rd Court of Baruipur 24-Parganas in Title Suit No. 290 of 1969.
2. The defendant no. 1 has preferred S. A. No. 86 of 1973 while defendant no. 2 has preferred S. A. 1788 of 1972 and plaintiff is the respondent no. 1 in both the appeals. These two appeals are taken up for hearing together.
3. The plaintiff instituted the suit for dissolution of partnership and for accounts or in the alternative, for accounts of the dissolved firm and for final decree of accounting and also for appointment of a Receiver and also for injunction.
The plaintiff's case, in brief, is as follows :-
4. That the plaintiff and the defendants no. 1 and 2 are the partners of a Cinema business run under the name and style of Mahamaya Talkies at Dakshin Barasat; that the plaintiff has experience in the cinema line business, the defendant no. 1 had land suitable for installation of cinema hall and the defendant no. 2 owned a projector machine; those three persons en
Maniam Maria Gowder v. Naga Mistry
K. Viswanathan v. Namakchand Gupta & anr. AIR 1955 Mad. 536
Pandurang Jivaji Apte v. Panchandra Gangadhar
Mafizuddin Khan Chowdury v. Hubibuddin Sk. & Ors. AIR 1957 Cal. 336
A. V. Varadarajilu Naidu (deceased) & Ors. v. K. V. Tharasi AIR 1963 Mad 413
Velu Padayachi v. Sivasooriam Pillai AIR 1950 Mad. 444
Radha Nath Seal v. Haripada Jana
I.C.I. (India) Pvt. Ltd., Calcutta v. The Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.