SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Cal) 62

M.N.ROY
S. N. Daga – Appellant
Versus
Anjali Gangopadhayay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Santanu Mukherjee for the petitioner.
Sudish Das Gupta, S. M. Coomer, Pankaj Kumar Samanta for the opp. Party.

ORDER

In this Rule under sub-s. 9 of S. 29B of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the petitioner has impeached an order dated 8th August 1683, passed in Ejectment Case No. 11/82 (E.V.C), by the learned Rent Controller, Calcutta and whereby an application made under Order 6 rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure as preferred by the opposite party, was allowed.

2. The petitioner has stated that Shri Puranjan Mukherjee, since deceased, in or about 1970 inducted him as a tenant in respect of the entire ground floor of premises no 18/79, Dover Lane, Calcutta–700029 at a monthly rent of Rs. 300/- payable according to English calendar month. It was his case that the said Puranjan Mukherjee died on or about 25th June 1978 and after his death, the petitioner was informed by Dr. Prodesh Ranjan Mukherjee, the son of the deceased, by the letter of 16th September 1978, that the said Shri Puranjan Mukherjee died intestate and the said Dr. Prodesh Ranian Mukherjee and Smt. Anjali Gangopadhyay were his only heirs and legal representatives. By the said letter, the petitioner has claimed to have been required to pay rent either to one Shri Pradyot Ran





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top