SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Cal) 463

DEBI PRASAD SARKAR
Karuna Sardar – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Sardar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Subhrokamal Mukherjee, for the Petitioner
Mr. Amiya Chaudhuri, for the Opposite Party

JUDGMENT

This is a revisional application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure directed against the order dated 16th July, 1990 passed in Misc. Appeal No. 96 of 1988 arising out of Misc. Case No. 56 of 1985 under Section 8 of the W.B.L.R. Act.

2. The present petitioner filed a case for pre-emption against the Opposite Party-Gopal Chandra Halder in respect of Plot No. 1368 under Khatian No. 1638 of Mouza Jorehat, P. S. Sankrail on the ground of vicinage. According to her she purchased five decimals of land of Plot No. 1366 of Khatian No. 423 of the same Mouza by two Sale Deeds namely one dated 28.7.66 and the other dated 1.6.81. The transfer that gave rise to the preemption case against the Opposite Party took place• on 17.8.79. The Opposite Party raised objection that the case was barred by limitation and the purchase of the petitioner was subsequent to the purchase of the Opposite Party.

3. The learned Trial Court did not accept the plea of limitation but found that the purchase by the petitioner took place in 1981, when the purchase to be pre-empted took place in 1979 and on the last ground the learned Trial Court dismissed the case. There was a Misc. Appeal before the l

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top