AMARENDRA NATH SEN
Monoj Kanti Basu – Appellant
Versus
Bank of India – Respondent
The Court : An interesting question of some importance concerning the rights and obligations of the Management and the Award Staff of a nationalised Bank arises for consideration in this writ petition.
2. Six employees of Bank of India, a nationalised Bank, (hereinafter referred to as the Bank), and Bank of India Employees' Union, the recognised union of the Bank, have presented this writ petition in which the validity of two orders or notices passed by the Management of the Bank have been questioned. The first order or notice dated 25.6.75 is contained in Annexure 'A' to the petition and is in the following terms :
NOTICE
Deduction of pro-rata wages for mass demonstration.
Certain members of award staff of Calcutta Branch and Regional Office held mass demonstrations on the following days leaving their respective desks :
Date Time
3.6.1975 2-30 p.m. to 4-30 p.m. 2 hours
4.6.1975 11-10 a.m. to 11-35 a.m. 25 minutes
6.6.1975 2-30 p.m. to 3.00 p.m. 30 minutes
17.6.1975 2-45 p.m. to 3-15 p.m. 30 minutes
(Note : The duration of 20 minutes on 6.6.75 from 2-10 p.m. 2-30 p.m. has not been taken into account, since this is part of the usual lunch hour recess of 30 minutes)
Since
Bombay Deying & Manufacturing Co. Ltd v. State of Bombay
A. K. Kraipak v. Union of India
Union of India v. K. P. Joseph
Mills v. Employees State Insurance Corpn.
N. Venkatavaradan v. Sembiam Saw Mills
Management of Churakulam Tea Estate (P) Ltd. v. Workmen
Bala Subrahamanya Rajaram v. B. C. Patel
Deokinandan Prasad v. State of Bihar
Daud Ahmad v. District Magistrate, Allahabad
Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway v. T. R. Challappan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.