I. P. MUKERJI
In the goods of : Jibendra Nath Biswas, since deceased – Appellant
Versus
Swadesh Ghosh – Respondent
Indra Prasanna Mukerji, J.
One Jibendra Nath Biswas obtained on lease from the Government of West Bengal on 30th March, 1997, a parcel of land comprising of 6.3522 cottahs, which was demarcated and described as plot No. 7 in Block-BA, Sector-1, of Bidhannagar in Salt Lake City, extension area District 24 Parganas (s), P.S. Salt Lake. The lease was for 999 years.
2. Jibendra Nath died on 5th November, 1991. Whether he died intestate or testate is the question to be ultimately answered. At the time of his death, he left behind Kuhu Biswas, his widow and two sons Dipta and Soumya, as his natural heirs. They are impleaded as the fifth to seventh respondents in this proceeding.
3. At least these three persons believed that Jibendra Nath had died intestate. This is for various reasons. They proposed to apply before the Urban Development Department of the Government of West Bengal to record their names as joint lessees, of the said property as the heirs of Jibendra Nath. In this connection Kuhu Biswas affirmed an affidavit on 14th May, 1996 before the Notary Public Calcutta, where she declared that Jibendra Nath had died intestate and that she and her two sons aged 25 years and 20
Krishan Kumar Sharma v. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
Kunvarjeet Singh Khandpur v. Kirandeep Kaur
Sarala Sundari Dassya v. Dinabandhu Roy Brajaraf Saha (Firm)
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.