JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA, DEBI PROSAD DEY
Reckitt Benckiser Health Care (India) Pvt. – Appellant
Versus
Emami Ltd – Respondent
Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.
This first miscellaneous appeal is directed against an order passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, 13th Court at Alipore on 28th May, 2015 in Title Suit No.1 of 2015 at the instance of the defendant No. 1/appellant.
2. In fact, by the impugned order, two applications were disposed of by the Learned Trial Judge. One of such applications was filed by the defendant No.1/appellant for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The learned Trial Judge held that the defendant's said application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is misconceived.
3. Hence, the said application was rejected.
4. However, the other application filed by the plaintiff for injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure was allowed by the learned Trial Judge. By the said order temporary injunction was passed restraining the defendant No.1 from displaying and/or playing and/or telecasting and/or airing the impugned advertisement for "MOOV" with the frames showing the product of the plaint
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.