SIDDHARTHA CHATTOPADHYAY
Ahok Kr. Todi – Appellant
Versus
C. B. I. – Respondent
1. All these revisional applications arose from the Order No. 57 dated 21.04.2011 in S.C. 103 of 2008 and Order No. 1 dated 21.04.2011 in S.T. 2 (11) passed by the learned Court below. By the impugned orders, the learned Court below dismissed, the applications under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. of the present petitioners of C.R.R. 1396 of 2011 (Ashok Todi vs. CBI), C.R.R. 1397 of 2011 (Pradip Todi vs. CBI), C.R.R. 1549 of 2011 (Anil Saraogi vs. CBI), C.R.R. 1573 of 2011 (Ajay Kumar vs. CBI), C.R.R. 1499 of 2011 (S.M. Mohiuddin @ Pappu vs. CBI), C.R.R. 3512 of 2011 (Sukanti Chakraborty, Krisnendu Das vs. CBI), and thereafter framed charges under Sections 306/120B/506 of I.P.C. against Ashok Todi, Pradip Todi, S.M. Mohiuddin @ Pappu and under Sections 506/120B I.P.C. against Ajay Kumar, Sukanti Chakraborty and Krisnendu Das. The C.B.I as well as Rukbanur Rahaman also challenged the impugned order stating inter alia that the police officials also ought to have been charged under Section 306 of I.P.C. By the consent of the parties, all these revisional applications be disposed of by a common judgment.
2. By way of prefatory observations, I may be permitted to mention that even nearl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.